Rachel GUI

Revision as of 12:43, 22 August 2011 (view source)

Hayes (Talk | contribs)

(→Tutorial videos and run-time help: Added link and moving videos to a beta version videos page)

← Older edit

Revision as of 12:46, 22 August 2011 (view source)

Hayes (Talk | contribs)

(→Tutorial videos and run-time help: moving some video content to a new page)

Newer edit →

Line 146:

The "raw counts" are estimated from a typical efficiency curve for Gammasphere, and the estimated absolute efficiency <math>\epsilon</math> is given as "Sim. eps" for each transition. Possion counting errors are based on the raw counts, while additional error on the ''total'' (simulated) efficiency-corrected counts may be added by the user.

-

~~# [http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~hayes/beta_rachel/accuracy_testing.html Testing the accuracy] of your Gosia calculations and the applicability of Gosia to a planned experiment.~~

-

# Semiclassical Coulomb excitation codes have inherent adiabaticity and eccentricity limits. [http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~hayes/beta_rachel/adiabaticity_limit.html This video] shows how to test for these limits with an experiment that would ''not'' be appropriate for Gosia.

-

# [http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~hayes/beta_rachel/experiment_planning.html Generating simulated data]. The errors in the simulated data are based on Poisson statistics and the expected number of days, beam current, etc. to estimate your ability to observe desired gamma-ray yields and to fit matrix elements to the observed yields. The present beta version applies ''optionally'' a quasi-gaussian random scatter of the predicted yield data [http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~hayes/beta_rachel/experiment_planning_2.html as demonstrated in this video] to better aid in predicting expected precision of fitted matrix elements. Watch this supplemental video to see how this works. You should also watch the [http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~hayes/beta_rachel/accuracy_testing.html accuracy testing video] to see if Gosia would be an appropriate analysis tool for your planned experiment.

===Troubleshooting===

From GOSIA

Revision as of 12:46, 22 August 2011

Views

Personal tools

Navigation

Search

Toolbox

@@ Line 146: / Line 146: @@
 The "raw counts" are estimated from a typical efficiency curve for Gammasphere, and the estimated absolute efficiency <math>\epsilon</math> is given as "Sim. eps" for each transition.  Possion counting errors are based on the raw counts, while additional error on the ''total'' (simulated) efficiency-corrected counts may be added by the user.
-# [http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~hayes/beta_rachel/accuracy_testing.html Testing the accuracy] of your Gosia calculations and the applicability of Gosia to a planned experiment.
-# Semiclassical Coulomb excitation codes have inherent adiabaticity and eccentricity limits. [http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~hayes/beta_rachel/adiabaticity_limit.html This video] shows how to test for these limits with an experiment that would ''not'' be appropriate for Gosia.
-# [http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~hayes/beta_rachel/experiment_planning.html Generating simulated data]. The errors in the simulated data are based on Poisson statistics and the expected number of days, beam current, etc. to estimate your ability to observe desired gamma-ray yields and to fit matrix elements to the observed yields. The present beta version applies ''optionally'' a quasi-gaussian random scatter of the predicted yield data [http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~hayes/beta_rachel/experiment_planning_2.html as demonstrated in this video] to better aid in predicting expected precision of fitted matrix elements. Watch this supplemental video to see how this works. You should also watch the [http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~hayes/beta_rachel/accuracy_testing.html accuracy testing video] to see if Gosia would be an appropriate analysis tool for your planned experiment.
 ===Troubleshooting===